💬
🤖
AI Support
24/7 online · instant AI reply
✕
← Back
1h ago · CoinTelegraph

Quantum fears already limiting Bitcoin’s growth, Stacks founder says

Speaking on Cointelegraph’s Chain Reaction podcast, Muneeb Ali warned that uncertainty over Bitcoin’s quantum security could deter institutional investors. Concerns about quantum computing are slowing institutional investment in Bitcoin, according to Stacks founder Muneeb Ali, who warned that the network needs a credible roadmap for security upgrades to restore investor confidence. “There is already a ceiling on the growth of Bitcoin because of quantum fears,” Ali said during an interview on Cointelegraph’s Chain Reaction podcast. He argued that uncertainty could lead risk-averse institutional investors to delay large Bitcoin purchases until developers establish a credible path toward quantum-resistant security. Stacks is a Bitcoin layer-2 network designed to bring smart contracts and decentralized applications to Bitcoin. Ali co-founded the project, which uses Bitcoin as its underlying settlement layer. Chain Reaction Podcast. Source: >Cointelegraph Ali warned that Bitcoin could enter a riskier period if developers fail to make meaningful progress toward quantum-resistant security by 2028. He said upgrades typically take years to implement, with additional time needed for users to move their holdings to new addresses. Ali pointed to 2030 as a target for transitioning to quantum-resistant security, citing guidance from the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). He suggested advances in artificial intelligence could accelerate the development of quantum computers, potentially bringing that timeline forward to 2029. Ali acknowledged that some Bitcoin proponents believe the quantum computing threat remains distant and concerns are overblown. He argued, however, that disagreements over the urgency of the threat could themselves undermine investor confidence, particularly without a credible upgrade roadmap. Related: Justin Sun says Tron’s post-quantum cryptography has gone live on testnet Despite his concerns, Ali said a sufficiently powerful quantum computer would more likely emerge from a major research laboratory than an unknown attacker. He suggested companies such as Google or Microsoft would have little incentive to use the technology to steal Bitcoin, given the potential legal consequences. Ali also said a quantum security threat to Bitcoin would affect the broader cryptocurrency industry, even projects developing their own protections. “If Bitcoin gets hit, everyone gets hit downstream as well,” he said. Meanwhile, developers are exploring ways to protect Bitcoin against quantum attacks. In September, StarkWare reported that researchers had

📌 Recommended Exchanges

OKX | Binance | Bybit | Bitget | Gate.io


AI Analysis:

🦊 Nova's Take Muneeb Ali's claim that quantum fears are already capping Bitcoin's upside is a narrative signal, not a technical one — no quantum machine today threatens secp256k1, but institutional risk committees price uncertainty, not just threat. The real message is that Bitcoin's "digital gold" thesis now carries a governance question: can the network coordinate a post-quantum upgrade without a contentious fork? 📊 Market Impact Short-term impact is minimal — this is a sentiment story, and BTC price action will still be driven by flows and macro liquidity rather than hypothetical quantum timelines. Mid-term, expect this to become a recurring institutional due-diligence talking point, mildly favoring quantum-resistant L1/L2 narratives (including Stacks' own positioning) over pure BTC beta. 💡 Trading Advice Treat this as a thematic rotation cue rather than a BTC sell signal — don't short Bitcoin on quantum headlines, but do watch whether "quantum-resistant" tokens start outperforming on narrative flows. Position sizing matters more than direction here; keep BTC exposure intact while expressing any quantum thesis through small, speculative allocations only. *Analysis for reference only — manage your risk.* 🦊

Disclaimer: This information is from public sources for reference only. Traceless does not guarantee accuracy.

💬 0
🏪 Strategies

💬 Comments

🔑 Login to leave a comment
No comments yet. Be the first!